Browse all 64 articles

Who should answer for unsafe water or poor sanitation?

A connection, a functioning service and safe water are different claims requiring different evidence.

Research checked · 2 min read · v2.0.0

A new water connection is not the same thing as a reliable water supply. Neither an installation count nor a photograph of clear water establishes that the water meets the applicable safety standard.

For a local problem, begin by identifying the operator and the part of the service that failed. Water supply and sanitation appear in the Constitution's municipal subject schedule, but actual responsibility must be established under the relevant local arrangements. 1 2

Ask which result is being counted

When a programme reports “coverage”, read its definition. Does it count installed connections, functioning connections, households receiving water or a tested service level? Do not replace one of these with another in a headline.

For a supply interruption, useful records may include the operator's schedule, outage notice and maintenance response. For a water-quality claim, ask for the actual test report, sample location, collection date, parameters tested and applicable standard. A test from somewhere else or a different period may not answer your question.

These are records to look for, not a claim that every operator publishes all of them online.

A hypothetical village example

A project dashboard lists a completed water work, but residents report repeated interruptions. Both observations could be real: the work may have been constructed while the current service remains unreliable.

eGramSwaraj's planning and progress modules can provide leads about panchayat works and expenditure. Use the relevant entry to identify the project and agency, then compare the record with the specific service complaint. The portal description is not a certification that a particular tap works. 3

Write two questions when necessary

For action: “Please investigate the interruption affecting these households on these dates and confirm the responsible service team.”

For records: “Please provide the existing inspection or maintenance record for this location and period.”

Separating the requests helps distinguish a demand to restore a service from a request to see evidence. An RTI request concerns existing information; it is not itself an instruction to carry out repairs. 4

Do not turn this into a home safety test

This page is about public accountability, not determining whether water is safe to drink. Do not use appearance or smell alone to certify safety, enter restricted facilities or handle suspected contamination to gather evidence. Use the operator's current advisories and qualified testing or public-health guidance for an actual exposure concern.

Sources and scope (4)

The check date records a research check, not continuous monitoring or a guarantee of current law.

  1. Constitution of India, official English compilation

    Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice · Twelfth Schedule, entries 4–6: roads, water and sanitation

    Edition: As on 1 May 2026

    Limits: This compilation has a stated cutoff. No assertion that every post-cutoff notification or judgment was exhaustively checked. Article explanations concern the provisions cited, not personalised legal advice.

    Source checked 13 October 2026.

  2. Constitution of India, official English compilation

    Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice · Article 243W: state legislation and municipal powers

    Edition: As on 1 May 2026

    Limits: This compilation has a stated cutoff. No assertion that every post-cutoff notification or judgment was exhaustively checked. Article explanations concern the provisions cited, not personalised legal advice.

    Source checked 13 October 2026.

  3. eGramSwaraj overview

    Ministry of Panchayati Raj · Panchayat Profile, Planning and Progress Reporting modules; record availability is not proof of delivery

    Source checked 13 October 2026.

  4. A Guide for the Information Seekers under the RTI Act 2005

    Department of Personnel and Training; official copy hosted by AIIMS Bhubaneswar · PDF page 5, printed page 2, paragraphs 2–4: existing information; no duty to create an answer to a hypothetical

    Edition: DoPT memorandum dated 8 November 2007
    Published: 2007-11-08

    Limits: Historical guide. The 2025 URL folder is not the publication date. Used only for existing-information versus creating answers distinction, not current fees, exemptions or deadlines.

    Source checked 13 October 2026.

Prepare a correction

Prepare a draft to copy or download. Nothing is sent or saved by this website; a submission destination has not been configured.

Download draft

Article version 2.0.0. Research checked 13 October 2026.
Assistant source checks; not independently human-reviewed. How we know · Corrections.

Try “MP”, “RTI” or “budget”.

↑ ↓ navigate   ↵ openOpen full search